Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 27 '17 at 19:48
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 166
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 258
33% 252 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 33.6
30% 32.6 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 33.6
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST310005 24NS 45W 1TB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB28 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 89.8
Mixed 73.5
65% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.31
75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback