| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081126 |
| Uptime | 4.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 20 '20 at 17:16 |
| Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 61% |
PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
35.5%
Below average
|
29% 34.7 Pts
|
4% 33 Pts
|
4% 66.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20%
Poor
|
17% 30.1 fps
|
25% 31.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maxtor 6L160P0 164GB-$55
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BAJ41G20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.6 7.8 13 8.8 7.4 MB/s
|
3.49%
Terrible
|
5% 5.95 MB/s
|
45% 0.27 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD253GM 250GB
73GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10205
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 67 67 57 53 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
48% 66.1 MB/s
|
115% 0.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
8% 2.8 GB/s
|
8% 2.63 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 407 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 75x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 56x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |