Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 04:52
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 275
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 883
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
EVGA(3842 2082) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB-$185
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 363 321 347 367 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 407
Mixed 502
SusWrite 346
172% 793 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 40.8
154% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 388
304% 421 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 165%
Great: 354%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
605GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 479 481 480 481 480 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 488
Mixed 461
SusWrite 480
109% 486 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.6
213% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB
27GB free
Firmware: K3110310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 268 277 272 271 271 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,247
Write 260
Mixed 439
SusWrite 271
121% 554 MB/s
4K Read 177
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 140
508% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 410
394% 651 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 257%
Great: 328%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 232 242 243 233 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
2TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 151 151 152 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 112
SusWrite 151
185% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 131 133 136 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 120
Write 133
Mixed 93
SusWrite 133
164% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.4
224% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 04CD F4-3200C16-16GTZR 04CD F4-3200C16-16GVK 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 33.4
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 31.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $938
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback