Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP SG3-250es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP SG3-250es (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AAF
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '20 at 09:49
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 41 2-Core 80.1 42% 63.6 Pts	4-Core 74.6 8-Core 79.1 10% 76.8 Pts	64-Core 82.1 5% 82.1 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 520GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 88 88 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 105 Write 106 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 87.1 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 62%
USB3.0 160GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 69GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 25.4 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 26.8 18% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 3,211 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.2 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback