Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FA
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 13:09
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 520
56% 446 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 16F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 6.53
6% 7.82 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 53 57 23 11 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,344
Write 871
Mixed 832
SusWrite 108
175% 789 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61
218% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 217
240% 395 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 149%
Great: 209%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 21.4
8% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 10.6
26% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 13.5
10% 14 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 12%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
555GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 33.2
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 21
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 87%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB
717GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 34.5
Mixed 33
SusWrite 4.8
35% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
108GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Read 37
Write 35
Mixed 25
SusWrite 0.1
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 PURX-64D85Y0 1TB
147GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.5% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 38
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 0.2
33% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.3 MB/s
ST6000VN 0033-2EE110 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 39
Write 37
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 36.5
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback