Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 24.9
2-Core 29.8
29% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 31.6
8-Core 41.4
5% 36.5 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.2 9.8 9.6 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 9
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 11
13% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 67%
Virtual HD 21GB
19GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.6 9.6 10 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 113
Write 13.5
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 10.1
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 3.2
467% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
1024, 3072 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.1
5% 1.63 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback