Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 00:31
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,133
100% 851 Pts
64-Core 2133
132% 2133 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 153
Parallax 130
122% 144 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 144
Splatting 113
101% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,082
Write 8,713
Mixed 9,099
2,004% 8,965 MB/s
4K Read 612
4K Write 529
4K Mixed 565
1,931% 569 MB/s
DQ Read 1,667
DQ Write 1,457
DQ Mixed 1,561
1,170% 1,562 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 374%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 50 32 14 43 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 98.2
Write 71.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 35.6
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
930GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 53 32 14 52 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 110
Write 77.2
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 38.5
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 110%
NORELSYS 106X 1TB
430GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 108 108 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 103
Write 91.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 108
108% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-22-22 D4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 34.9
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 33.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback