Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD4-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD4-B3  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '17 at 01:23
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$85
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 514
57% 448 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1548 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 72.5
61% 75.6 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 63.7
58% 72.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 38GB
27GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 115
Write 98
Mixed 99
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.43
105% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
52GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 97
Mixed 89.4
71% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.63
127% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD4-B3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD4-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback