Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime17.3 Days
Run DateMay 03 '20 at 23:21
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 92.5
44% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 233
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 836B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 9.92
Parallax 3.38
0% 4.47 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 3.47
Splatting 4.74
4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 39 30 38 13 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 715
Write 44.8
Mixed 199
SusWrite 65.6
55% 256 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 30.4
103% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 250
205% 299 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 337%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
309GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 74 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 78.8
Write 71.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 75
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Adata 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback