Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101210
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 38
2-Core 74.7
41% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 124
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 91.1
58% 79.8 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 61.7
57% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
532GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 154 97 117 149 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 172
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 132
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 113%
MD20000-BSDW-RO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 131 131 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 146
Write 116
Mixed 73
SusWrite 132
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
5GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 3.7 3.8 4 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
7.72% Terrible
Read 27
Write 8.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 4.1
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
83% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback