Today's hottest deals

HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory124.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 11:32
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 156
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 617
55% 463 Pts
64-Core 2,447
151% 2,447 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 36.9
31% 35 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 37.2
Splatting 35.7
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256GB 253GB
358GB free
Firmware: P1003BR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 604 609 605 603 594 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 111%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 311 310 312 311 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,115
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,146
SusWrite 476
289% 1,302 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 64.2
218% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 586
425% 556 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 206%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
360GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2002 2001 1201 1073 1071 1071 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,101
Write 1,959
Mixed 1,505
SusWrite 1,403
391% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 61.9
206% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 580
423% 553 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 258%
Great: 372%
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 383 381 388 381 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 388
Write 272
Mixed 104
SusWrite 383
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 1.4
8% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 7.6
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 6.6
6% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 45.7
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 18.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback