Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 114% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	124.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2048 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '17 at 08:58
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 96 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 40 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 217 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 746 69% 577 Pts	64-Core 2,917 180% 2,917 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 124 Parallax 105 111% 122 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 136 Splatting 109 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 645GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 209 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 80 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 63 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3083469354	71.5% Very good	Read 371 Write 359 Mixed 362 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 21.6 107% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.4 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 14.9 26% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 124%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 791 Write 663 Mixed 706 160% 720 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 23.1 83% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 32 DQ Mixed 13.3 14% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 243%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 175 175 21494759729 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 119 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 211 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 77 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 121 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 171800199206 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	90.7% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 156 Mixed 147 116% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.45 4K Mixed 0.41 148% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 113%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB 11,016 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 335GB free, PID 259f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 39.2 Mixed 31.2 47% 36.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.26 70% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x16GB 2,632 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	152% Outstanding	MC Read 87.4 MC Write 51.9 MC Mixed 48.6 179% 62.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 17.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	23x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	19x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $80Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $363

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363