bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 14:28
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 152
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1.2GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.14.1.51
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 6.46
Parallax 7.06
5% 6.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 54GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 505
Write 484
Mixed 495
111% 495 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 24.9
96% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 77.9
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 35.8
36% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback