Dell PowerEdge T320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge T320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T320  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 00:12
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1410 0
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 59.3
41% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 415
29% 267 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 72
Parallax 70.2
50% 67.7 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 62.6
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
454GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 94 107 108 109 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 143
Write 121
Mixed 81
SusWrite 101
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B1K70CH0-YH9 00CE00B300CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 00CE00B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YH9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.8% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.2
22% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T320 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback