Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 02:56
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370E-$471
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 111
56% 87 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 340
33% 272 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1497 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 40.6
24% 32.9 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 31.8
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 254 243 239 245 261 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66% Good
Read 452
Write 254
Mixed 243
SusWrite 244
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 23.4
85% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 129
102% 146 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66%
Great: 86%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 85 82 91 88 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 75.9
Write 83.7
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 83.6
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 100%
TDKMedia Trans-It Drive 16GB
7GB free, PID 062a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 8.3 15 13 6.4 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Read 16.6
Write 7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 9.9
12% 9.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 17.2
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback