Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 00:54
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 361
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 109
Reflection 122
Parallax 108
89% 113 fps
Splatting 87
89% 87 fps
Poor: 68% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 160 145 142 158 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 412
Write 166
Mixed 183
SusWrite 150
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 19.5
76% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 96
90% 146 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 76%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 239GB
87GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 199 192 184 185 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 286
Write 138
Mixed 125
SusWrite 187
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 12.8
45% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 59.7
59% 99.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 167%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
429GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 216 239 239 237 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 336
Write 231
Mixed 245
SusWrite 227
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 31
105% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 155
119% 162 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
188GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 100 110 118 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 106
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
83GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 4.1 5.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B CT102464BD186D.C16 859B CT102464BD186D.C16 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD5H Builds (Compare 1,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback