Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display720 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180524
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 01:19
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-7Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 75
38% 59 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 128
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.93
Reflection 8.46
Parallax 6.12
5% 6.84 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 12
8% 8.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: QHY11A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 288
Write 260
Mixed 170
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 8.7
51% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 61.4
84% 151 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 90%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB
86GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 52
Write 51.5
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 10.8
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 2TB
134GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 90.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 10.8
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 5TB
555GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 19
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 10.8
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 66%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
Read 94
Write 112
Mixed 70
SusWrite 10.8
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%
Jmicron Generic DISK04 10TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 82
Write 151
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 10.8
62% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.5
313% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback