HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime32 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 22:45
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3687U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 143
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 201
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.88
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 7
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB800G6R 800GB
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G201DL2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 398 423 389 383 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 306
Write 382
Mixed 288
SusWrite 395
78% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 22.6
85% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 234
178% 241 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 95%
Intel 525 Series mSATA 120GB-$119
111GB free
Firmware: LLLi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 131 128 131 125 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 346
Write 157
Mixed 194
SusWrite 131
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 20
78% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 171
132% 183 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback