Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag 1000975;2160089

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemWortmann_ag 1000975;2160089  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3598-B1
Memory122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 07:22
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2255
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 967
93% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,690
105% 1,690 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 170
Parallax 162
139% 167 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 150
Splatting 110
118% 149 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 125%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1840 1658 1545 1528 1532 1515 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 1,986
Write 1,649
Mixed 1,518
SusWrite 1,603
380% 1,689 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 65.2
248% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 1,090
819% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 302%
Great: 355%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
935GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2124 2130 1521 1534 1549 1547 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,188
Write 2,133
Mixed 1,714
SusWrite 1,734
437% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 67.8
253% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 1,073
DQ Mixed 1,152
862% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 322%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 38.1
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1000975;2160089 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Wortmann_ag 1000975;2160089

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback