Today's hottest deals

Embest 64-bit Raspberry Pi 3 (rev. A22082)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmbest 64-bit Raspberry Pi 3 (rev. A22082)  (all builds)
MotherboardEmbest 64-bit Raspberry Pi 3 (rev. A22082)
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 08:11
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: BCM2837 ARMv8
Socket, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.6 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 1.9
2-Core 3.7
1% 2.8 Pts
4-Core 8.3
8-Core 7.6
1% 7.95 Pts
64-Core 7.7
0% 7.7 Pts
Poor: 3% Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Generic SL16G SD Card 16GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.2
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.2
4% 4.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 24%
Mass Storage Device 2GB
2GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 3.2
6% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
23% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OSV 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DRAM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
MC Read 0.4
MC Write 0.9
MC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.43 GB/s
Latency 1,159
4% 1,159 ns
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 11%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback