Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '20 at 06:51
Run Duration	406 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 122 56% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 353 36% 290 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37.8 34% 36.6 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 36 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 290 292 294 284 293 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 452 Mixed 445 SusWrite 268 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 87 4K Mixed 55.9 185% 62.5 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 58.6 DQ Mixed 79 62% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 122%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 563GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 179 166 162 173 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 164 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 156 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 107%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 128GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 75 75 76 75 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 46.3 Write 48.5 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 72.2 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G 4x8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.2% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.7 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	290x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359