Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 480
45% 376 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 60.6
Parallax 58.9
50% 60.5 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 64.7
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 230 194 263 262 266 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 436
Write 264
Mixed 216
SusWrite 245
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 26.6
119% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 191
176% 272 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
911GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 50 57 57 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 43.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 53.9
34% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1.5TB
437GB free
Firmware: 0410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.2
2% 3.17 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback