Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 19:12
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 144
54% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 430
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 825
Write 498
Mixed 97.3
103% 473 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 48
166% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 68.2
73% 128 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 408 410 410 416 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 385
Write 374
Mixed 358
SusWrite 409
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 21.9
98% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 39.4
80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 99%
Tph00402 999GB 0 3TB
196GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 36.8
Mixed 34
SusWrite 37.5
27% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 87%
External USB 3.0 250GB
179GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.28% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 16
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 19.7
11% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 23.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback