Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-51  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer M3_SK
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 148
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 240
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1140) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4526
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 5.87
5% 7.24 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 13.3
8% 9.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D256 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T881202 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 489
Write 406
Mixed 322
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 9.45
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 9.26
38% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 9.67
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 4.43
39% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF25664HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 20.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-51 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback