Asus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory121 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 02:56
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
sTRX4, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 295
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,176
104% 882 Pts
64-Core 4,443
275% 4,443 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 143
Parallax 142
118% 143 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 127
Splatting 107
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 1790 1601 1460 1716 1422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 1,107
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 1,561
292% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 32.3
120% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 710
528% 699 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 221%
Great: 499%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2166 1403 929 933 934 924 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,299
Write 1,591
Mixed 1692
SusWrite 1,215
328% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 41.7
138% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 728
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 807
588% 761 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 202%
Great: 413%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EARS-00S 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 107 106 107 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
Read 80.8
Write 95
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 105
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%
Amd-raid ST5000DM000-1FK1 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 149 149 150 161 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 80.1
Write 90.4
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 150
58% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.1
206% 3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 67%
Amd-raid ST8000DM004-2CX1 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 147 136 140 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 89.4
Write 104
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 140
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 100%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
56GB free, PID a83a, Asus USB utility
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 40 38 38 35 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 127
Write 10.7
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 34.5
47% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
160% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 35%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
18GB free, PID a83a, Asus USB Utility with Linux Partition
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 43 41 43 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 129
Write 5.7
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 41.9
58% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.5
162% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 35%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 253GB
8GB free, PID 1a15
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 58 28 62 32 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 131
Write 49.9
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 42.4
72% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
122% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 45%
USB DISK 2.0 12GB
9GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.7 7.5 5.9 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 16.1
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 8
12% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 250GB
28GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 24 21 27 29 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 86.7
Write 47.2
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 28.1
68% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.4
159% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 77.4
MC Write 76.3
MC Mixed 79.3
222% 77.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 192%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH II EXTREME ALPHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $3,205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback