Asus P5G41T-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M LX  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 76.2
42% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 143
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
XFX(1682 7250) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 14.4
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 14.7
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD3200AAJS 320GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 06.04E06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 64 53 55 56 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 29.4
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 57.6
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$22
131GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 184 185 184 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 180
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 185
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41T-M LX Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M LX - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback