Today's hottest deals

NEC PC-VN500JG3E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNEC PC-VN500JG3E  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC OA1
Memory1.1 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 03:48
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3400+-$20
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 49.5
1-Core 12.1
2-Core 16.9
21% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 20.1
8-Core 26
3% 23 Pts
64-Core 25.8
2% 25.8 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon X1200
Device(1033 8872) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.371.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.15
0% 0.21 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HMSM064G-20 64GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Ver 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 14 28 23 20 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
Read 58.7
Write 53.5
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 24.6
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.5
265% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%
FUJITSU MHW2120BH 120GB
95GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 15 13 12 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.64% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 13.1
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 12.8
17% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.64%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 35GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback