Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 18:39
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 847
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Lighting 94.2
Reflection 85
Parallax 80.4
77% 86.5 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 76.5
72% 90.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 230 225 223 218 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 252
Mixed 268
SusWrite 223
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 42.1
153% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 179
142% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 133%
ST12000NM0008-2H 12TB
10TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 96 106 101 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 220
Write 214
Mixed 205
SusWrite 114
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.5
57% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 32%
ST12000NM0008-2H 12TB
407GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 225 226 232 232 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 161
SusWrite 229
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 1.2
71% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2.7
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 2.2
4% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST14000NM002G 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: E002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 198 192 198 196 200 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
Read 185
Write 174
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 196
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 2.4
51% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 7.8
DQ Write 7.7
DQ Mixed 2.7
3% 6.07 MB/s
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
21TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 98 105 100 109 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 219
Write 211
Mixed 152
SusWrite 103
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 1.6
82% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDN726060AL 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: W7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 215 204 211 210 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 218
Mixed 104
SusWrite 210
135% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
195% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
266GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 115 109 131 131 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 175
Write 176
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 124
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDN726060AL 6TB
300GB free
Firmware: W7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 218 206 217 219 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 216
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 111%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST14000NM002G 14TB
2TB free
Firmware: E002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 160 172 165 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HDN721010ALE604 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83XN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 171 170 182 176 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 167
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 177
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.3
356% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 63%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback