Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 23.2 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 32.4 15% 23.7 Pts	4-Core 37.2 8-Core 37.9 5% 37.6 Pts	64-Core 42.3 3% 42.3 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 2.12 1% 1.81 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0Q5E SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 68 59 60 63 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	34% Below average	Read 55.2 Write 78.8 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 63.4 40% 55.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G9P1 1x2GB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.45% Terrible	MC Read 0.6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 0.6 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 298 13% 298 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.45% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	320x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	151x
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	473x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MZYTY128HDHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,392 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 18%, 1,365 samples	196x
4KTF25664HZ-1G9P1 2x2GBMicronBench 17%, 1,473 samples	177x
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 640 samples	44x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28