Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180914
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '20 at 03:01
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500-$173 43,089 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 243 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 674 74% 584 Pts	64-Core 715 44% 715 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.7% Above average	Lighting 63.2 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 54.5 52% 60.4 fps	MRender 60.4 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 61 49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 596 598 599 520 551 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	258% Outstanding	Read 2,313 Write 2,088 Mixed 1,534 SusWrite 584 364% 1,630 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 74.8 241% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 1,323 DQ Write 1,134 DQ Mixed 1,204 909% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 258% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 320GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 155 154 154 152 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 156 Write 151 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 154 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 132 136 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 102 Write 113 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 130 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 181% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.9% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 22.6 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 25.8 SC Mixed 23.6 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	14x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16