Asus P5RD1-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5RD1-VM  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 18:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 42.8
1-Core 23
2-Core 30.5
23% 32.1 Pts
4-Core 32.5
8-Core 35.5
4% 34 Pts
64-Core 38
2% 38 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200
Asus(1043 819A) 64MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.18 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SV1203N 120GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TQ100-24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.8 8.2 9.6 10 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 30.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 8.7
14% 18.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 1.5
MC Mixed 1
4% 1.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5RD1-VM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus P5RD1-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback