ADD TO PC
BUILD

Viak8m AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	1GB is enough RAM for Windows XP.
OS Version	Windows XP is considerably out of date. This system has enough RAM (1GB) and should be upgraded to Windows 10.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Viak8m AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	K8M800-8237
Memory	0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 x 65536 szÃn
OS	Windows XP
BIOS Date	20061229
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '15 at 17:06
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 900 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 25.4 2-Core 26.1 13% 25.8 Pts	4-Core 25.6 8-Core 26.1 3% 25.9 Pts	64-Core 26.4 2% 26.4 Pts
Poor: 16% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Quantum FIREBALLlct20 20 20GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 17GB free Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 80 78 2583 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 5589 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 7993 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 60 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 5331 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 37 882752 (C4) Reallocation count 100 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 178 22	4.93% Terrible	Read 8.32 Write 8.66 Mixed 7.86 6% 8.28 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.17 41% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 12%
Maxtor STM380215A 80GB 346 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 6GB free (System drive) Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 100 104404546 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 9214 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 322058416 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 12142 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8909 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 56 723255339 (C2) HDA temperature 43 44 55834574891 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 83 63 198964944 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	38.6% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 64 Mixed 47.3 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.32 75% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback