Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion dv6000 (GM695LA#ABM)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion dv6000 (GM695LA#ABM)  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30B7
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 15:51
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-56
Socket S1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 53.5
32% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 53.3
8-Core 53.5
7% 53.4 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6150
HP(103C 30B7) 64MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7967
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.25
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.07%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542512K9S 120GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 41 46 45 47 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 51.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 42
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.53 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dv6000 (GM695LA#ABM) Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Pavilion dv6000 (GM695LA#ABM)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback