Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '15 at 03:05
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 194
66% 145 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 557
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Nvidia(10DE 0804) 768MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 13.5
12% 15.5 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 15.2
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
76.4% Very good
Read 268
Write 213
Mixed 178
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 41.3
144% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 103
98% 155 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 134%
WD WD1501FASS-00U0B 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 177
Write 133
Mixed 72.5
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.71
4K Mixed 0.48
136% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 82%
Maxtor 6 204GB
66GB free
Firmware: BAH4
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 39.4
Write 38.9
Mixed 48.6
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.14
77% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 33%
Maxtor S 200GB
61GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
Read 55.6
Write 53.1
Mixed 50.6
40% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.42
97% 0.78 MB/s
Seagate FreeAgent Pro 750GB
164GB free, PID 3010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26.5
Mixed 13.7
29% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.32
48% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 18%
Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback