Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 863C
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime12.8 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 04:39
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 50.8
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 52.2
34% 50 Pts
4-Core 49.9
8-Core 57.1
7% 53.5 Pts
64-Core 47.6
3% 47.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 863C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.48
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.89 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 24 20 43 25 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 98.3
Write 115
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 35
64% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0xCD04 F4-2133C15-8GRS 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback