Asus 1005HA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 1005HA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1005HA
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 19:12
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N280
PBGA 437, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 42
1-Core 6.5
2-Core 7
16% 18.5 Pts
4-Core 10.2
8-Core 8.9
1% 9.55 Pts
64-Core 6.4
0% 6.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 36 43 36 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 11.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 42.4
15% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 36%
Single Flash Reader 32GB
0GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 6.4 9 5.3 8.9 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 5
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 6.1
8% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.1% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.77 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback