Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 18:19
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 57
2-Core 118
49% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 163
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 76.5
50% 67.5 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 53.1
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS32GHSD370 32GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 36 31 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 196
Write 39
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 30.8
18% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 22.5
74% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 37.6
DQ Mixed 27.2
22% 31 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 40%
Transcend TS128GSSD420 128GB
4GB free
Firmware: N0815B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 217
Write 140
Mixed 151
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 26.1
85% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 37.7
35% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 79%
Seagate ST250VT000-1DK141 250GB
165GB free
Firmware: 0002SDC2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 18 19 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 16.2
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 17.9
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback