Intel DH55TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL_ DH55TC__
MotherboardIntel DH55TC  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '17 at 19:07
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 123
54% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 184
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Intel(8086 0036) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 265
Write 209
Mixed 132
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 28
89% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 45.9
50% 83 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
472GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 35.7
Mixed 20.1
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.14
46% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 48%
Jmb352 RAID-1 2TB
312GB free
Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.5% Below average
Read 60.1
Write 63.5
Mixed 24.9
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.18
60% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
132GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 61.2
Mixed 38.9
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.19
56% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
78GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 103
Mixed 28.5
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.19
51% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-010.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback