Today's hottest deals

HP 23-g005la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 23-g005la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B08
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 19:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3800 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Memory 15.2
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 33.9
13% 22.7 Pts
4-Core 55.9
8-Core 57.7
8% 56.8 Pts
64-Core 64.1
4% 64.1 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
HP(103C 2B08) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.1000
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 1.78
1% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 9 13 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 8
Write 5.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 13.8
6% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.67% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5.4
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.9
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.43 GB/s
Latency 358
11% 358 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback