Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1985
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '17 at 13:04
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5150M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 93.1
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 59.4
45% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 26.7
8-Core 26.8
4% 26.8 Pts
64-Core 60.1
4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
HP(103C 1985) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 2.16
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 96
Mixed 92.2
72% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1HS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 4.5
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback