Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 17:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 683
65% 538 Pts
64-Core 1,494
92% 1,494 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 36.2
34% 39 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 39.1
34% 42 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 512GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 59 104 233 51 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 421
Write 397
Mixed 357
SusWrite 129
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 38.8
128% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 253
196% 266 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 113%
WD Re 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 16 19 17 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.1
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback