Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 19:54
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 95
2-Core 196
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 618
61% 497 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 92.5
81% 100 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 98.3
79% 95.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 153 112 100 13 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 342
Write 314
Mixed 277
SusWrite 115
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 24.4
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 153
133% 198 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 97%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 165 168 168 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 161
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 168
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 8
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback