MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '20 at 08:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 202
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 666
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 29
16% 22.1 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 25
Splatting 23.5
16% 19 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900813
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 287 296 297 301 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 184
Mixed 281
SusWrite 294
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 38.5
147% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 223
185% 263 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 91%
Adata HV320 1TB
514GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 130 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 131
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback