HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8597
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 20:27
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 268
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 665
77% 597 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8597) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 8.28
6% 8.85 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 15.5
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CL1-8D128-HP 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 141 144 81 92 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 1044
Write 165
Mixed 103
SusWrite 117
76% 357 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 2.4
56% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 149
126% 186 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 130%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
26GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 20 18 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 13.7
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 18.2
25% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback