Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 23:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 271
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 6.75
5% 7.92 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 13.6
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600S 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 434 208 162 108 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 1,141
Write 881
Mixed 692
SusWrite 238
164% 738 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 7.6
102% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 60.5
DQ Mixed 259
180% 234 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 159%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
406GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 117 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 73.7
Write 113
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 116
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-058.A00G 04CB AO1P21FC4R1-B2MS 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback