HP xw8400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP xw8400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A08h
Memory1.6 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070612
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 08 '17 at 15:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 27
2-Core 53.6
35% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 212
19% 159 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3500
Nvidia(10DE 032B) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 2.33
6% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 1.5TB
924GB free
Firmware: 3000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 244
Write 29.2
Mixed 55.7
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.12
53% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 93.7
Mixed 30.1
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 6.26
4K Mixed 0.67
216% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback