Asus K55N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus K55N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55N
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 20:56
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-4400M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 47.6
1-Core 32.5
2-Core 61.2
30% 47.1 Pts
4-Core 59.4
8-Core 60.8
8% 60.1 Pts
64-Core 64.5
4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Asus(1043 105B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 3.06
0% 2.32 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 62 58 42 56 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 81.7
Write 69
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 56.9
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
4GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 91
Mixed 103
133% 108 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.2
231% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55N Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback