PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP xw8400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A08h |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20080307 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 01 '20 at 09:05 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 67% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon 5160
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 445.75
|
9%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 20 19 21 18 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.7 5.8 6 6 6 MB/s
|
4.39%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 8x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |