HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 22:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Memory 18.3
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 76.4
29% 52 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 191
16% 141 Pts
64-Core 93.4
6% 93.4 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.78
3% 4.59 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 0.13
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd0163abyx-23 39M4507 42C0462IBM 160GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 66 64 62 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 83
Write 82.2
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 57.2
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 334
12% 334 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback