HP Z240 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z240 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802E
Memory45.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime22.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 12:46
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 44.3
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 55.8
26% 41 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 306
22% 203 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 1.19
2% 2.08 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.83
2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0012
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 347
Write 136
Mixed 248
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 16.2
51% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 245
164% 198 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 94%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB
275GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 33 31 36 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 39.7
Write 40.7
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 36.7
54% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 8.9
575% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC HMA82GU6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback